This may become an issue:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/202 ... enerators/
Merry New years all!
Maybe an issue???
Maybe an issue???
KISS is the key!
- wwonderfull
-
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 8:27 am
- Contact:
Re: Maybe an issue???
Ever since artificial intelligence came to image generation, it brought a new scope for image development. but the thing is that the ai image generator itself was trained with pictures taken from the web. now the copyright thing is something complicated, especially for lawmakers because of certain licensing and maintaining the compliance and use of the image asset itself.
People used to capture or illustrate vector graphics and even manipulate Rester graphics photo all the time even before ai started doing it. When ai got the image market it started taking down the freelancing sectors of image creation but now somehow it is taking down those who are creating images using ai too now. So, it is the copy right war of people's data vs peoples profit so depends on which peoples side we are on.
from a site kavinoky below information was found
In conclusion I still think the copyright thing will not be an issue in the future. They might do legal adjustments for this as Ai is in developing stage it was given access explicitly without permission of many people's assets such as knowledge or even art.
People used to capture or illustrate vector graphics and even manipulate Rester graphics photo all the time even before ai started doing it. When ai got the image market it started taking down the freelancing sectors of image creation but now somehow it is taking down those who are creating images using ai too now. So, it is the copy right war of people's data vs peoples profit so depends on which peoples side we are on.
from a site kavinoky below information was found
And...Current Copyright Stance on AI-Only Works
According to guidance from the U.S. Copyright Office published in March 2023, it is “well-established” that copyright protection is only available for content produced by human creativity. The term “author,” as used in copyright and Constitutional law, excludes non-humans. For example, there have been cases where selfies taken by a monkey or words said to be written by non-human spiritual beings did not qualify for copyright protection because they lacked human authors.
The same is true for images created by a machine, even when a person provides the machine with a prompt. The Copyright Office guidance says that when AI generates an image (or other type of complex work) from a human prompt, the technology, not the human, is executing the “traditional elements of authorship” – and, therefore, the image is not the product of human authorship and cannot be copyrighted. These AI-generated images are in the public domain.
However, if there is “sufficient” human involvement in creating an image that contains AI-generated material, then part or all of the work may be copyrighted. But how much is “sufficient”? That key question in AI image copyright law is still being worked out.
Copyright Issues Around Training Data
While the question of the copyrightability of AI-generated images deals with the output of AI models, there are also copyright issues arising at the other end, from the input. AI image generators get trained on massive amounts of data, much of it copyrighted material. Some individuals and organizations are going to court to try to stop AI companies from using their images and words. In 2023, the New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft and Getty Images sued Stable Diffusion. In November 2024, five of Canada’s largest news companies filed a joint suit against OpenAI. The AI companies are claiming fair use as a defense.
In conclusion I still think the copyright thing will not be an issue in the future. They might do legal adjustments for this as Ai is in developing stage it was given access explicitly without permission of many people's assets such as knowledge or even art.